In a May 20 story about travel spending at the World Health Organization, The Associated Press erroneously said that data about the agency’s tour spending was acquired from internal documents. The records became publicly available on WHO’s website on May 9.


A corrected model of the tale is below:

UN fitness organization struggles with tour abuses

The UN fitness corporation spent nearly $192 million on travel for the remaining 12 months, with a few staffers breaking its policies by traveling in commercial enterprise-class while now not warranted.


AP Medical Writer

LONDON (AP) — The World Health Organization spent nearly $192 million on travel charges in the last 12 months, with staffers now and again breaking the employer’s own rules utilizing journeying in enterprise elegance, reserving steeply-priced final-minute tickets, and touring without the specified approvals, in keeping with documents lately published by way of WHO on its website.

The abuses could spook capacity donors and partners as the organization starts its week-length annual meeting Monday in Geneva, looking for extended aid to combat a devastating outbreak of Ebola in Congo and different lethal sicknesses such as polio, malaria, and measles.

The nearly $192 million has been down 4% since 2017, while the agency pledged to rein in tour abuses following an AP investigation.

WHO auditors observed that a few WHO staffers had been misrepresenting the reasons for their travel to make the most loopholes inside the employer’s regulations and flying enterprise elegance, which can be several times more luxurious than the financial system. However, they did now not meet the criteria to achieve this.

In reaction to questions from the AP, WHO said Monday that “tour is regularly critical to accomplishing humans in need” and stated that 55% of its travel spending went to transport outdoors specialists and United States of America representatives, often from developing countries, to technical and other meetings.

Severa’s new measures were adopted in 2018 to ensure that a “team of workers travels is important, competitively priced, appropriate and efficient.” The business enterprise stated a usual reduction in business magnificence journeys by 49% for non-personnel and a drop of forty% for WHO staffers.

“When personnel journey, they consider a range of factors, including responding to emergencies, assessing countries’ emergency preparedness, implementing vaccine and other public fitness campaigns, training medical examiners, and more,” the agency said.

But WHO’s inability to noticeably cut back its costs ought to undermine its credibility and make it more difficult to raise cash to fight health crises, according to Sophie Harman, a global health professor at Queen Mary University in London. She stated that the trouble wasn’t the amount spent on the journey but how it became used.

“WHO desires to get its very own residence that allows you to legitimately go to the global community announcing, ‘We want more money for Ebola,'” she stated.